Case Studies

Family engaged us before finalising a match for their daughter. The prospective groom claimed to be a senior manager at a Lucknow IT firm. Field verification found no record of his employment at the stated company. Source interviews revealed a previous marriage, undisclosed to the family, dissolved two years prior. Engagement was cancelled.

A textile manufacturer suspected a senior accounts executive of processing fictitious vendor invoices. Undercover investigation over two weeks documented the executive's meetings with a fictitious vendor's representative. Evidence submitted to company management led to termination and FIR filing under IPC 420.

Parents of a 19-year-old woman contacted us after she stopped responding to calls. Police had registered a General Diary entry but taken no active steps. Within 4 days, our investigators located her in Prayagraj with an individual she had met online. She was an adult and had left voluntarily, parents were informed, and family contact was re-established.

Client suspected spouse of maintaining a relationship with a colleague during frequent 'work trips'. Surveillance over 11 days documented the spouse's actual movements during three claimed work trips. Documented report submitted to client's legal counsel for use in divorce proceedings.

Before entering a joint venture, a Prayagraj businessman engaged us to verify his prospective partner's claimed property portfolio. Proprietary verification methods confirmed ownership of only one of three claimed properties. The others were found to be held in a relative's name. Business terms were renegotiated accordingly.

A Lucknow retail chain suspected systematic inventory theft at one of its branches. An undercover investigator placed within the workforce documented the theft operation over 18 days, identifying three employees involved. Management filed police complaint with documented evidence; all three were arrested.

An Agra jeweller sought to recover a significant debt from a businessman who had vanished after taking a consignment on credit. Field investigation across Agra, Mathura, and Delhi NCR traced the individual to a relative's address in Noida within 6 days. Legal proceedings were initiated.

A family in Gorakhpur requested verification of a prospective groom working in the Gulf. All claimed credentials, employment, financial status, family background, were confirmed through field investigation and international source verification. Family proceeded with confidence.

A Noida-based FMCG distributor engaged us to understand why a key client had abruptly shifted to a competitor. Competitive intelligence investigation over three weeks revealed the competitor had hired a former employee who carried the client relationship and pricing knowledge. Client restructured their terms and retention approach.

A client with concerns about a long-term partner requested a loyalty test before proposing marriage. The decoy approach was made over 3 days across different contexts. The partner declined all advances and did not engage with the decoy. Report provided to client; engagement proceeded.

A mother involved in a custody dispute needed to demonstrate that the father's claimed sobriety was not sustained. Surveillance over 16 days documented multiple instances inconsistent with claimed sobriety. Evidence submitted to the presiding Family Court judge through the client's advocate.

A Meerut family's elderly father disappeared after a family dispute. Police had categorised the case as voluntary absence. Our investigators traced the individual through network analysis to a distant relative's home in Dehradun. Family was reunited with consent of the individual.

A manufacturing firm in Kanpur ran a senior hire past us before confirming the offer. The candidate's claimed MBA from a reputed institution could not be verified, the institution confirmed no record of the candidate's enrollment. The offer was rescinded.

A Varanasi handloom factory suspected a supervisor of running a parallel operation using company resources and designs. Undercover investigation confirmed the supervisor was coordinating production at a competitor facility using proprietary patterns. Civil and criminal action followed.

A Bareilly family sought background verification on a prospective match from Delhi. Financial status verification revealed significant undisclosed credit card and personal loan liabilities totalling over twelve lakhs. Family declined to proceed.